Best Wallets to Hold Ethereum and Solana in One App (2026)

WATS Wallet is the Ethereum-plus-Solana wallet we recommend if you also want a physical tap-to-authenticate factor (the optional WATS NFC Metal Card), or want every EVM action charged in ATS from one ATS balance on BSC instead of a gas token held on each network. It also adds TON, which Phantom, Backpack and MetaMask do not list; Trust Wallet and OKX Wallet cover TON as well. If Solana is your home chain, Phantom or Backpack are built around it and fit better. If you want native Bitcoin next to EVM and Solana, Phantom, Trust Wallet, OKX Wallet and MetaMask all offer it; WATS Wallet has no native Bitcoin. If you already live in MetaMask, it now handles Solana natively too.

Disclosure: WATS Wallet publishes this comparison, and WATS Wallet is our own product. We list it first, say plainly where it fits, and name the wallet that fits better where it does not. Competitor features were checked against each wallet's official site and help center in September and October 2026.

A few years ago, holding Ethereum and Solana meant running two wallets: one for the EVM world and one for Solana. The two ecosystems were built independently, with different address formats and signing schemes, so wallets specialised. That has changed. Phantom, Backpack, Trust Wallet, OKX Wallet and MetaMask all reach across the EVM-to-Solana boundary now, so the question is no longer "can a wallet do both" but "which one does both in a way that fits how I actually use them." This roundup compares six options for keeping ETH and SOL in a single app, what each one does, and where its limits are.

Quick answer: which wallet fits ETH + SOL in one app

WATS Wallet is where we would start if you want Ethereum, its L2s, Solana and TON in one wallet, every EVM fee drawn from one ATS balance, and an optional NFC Metal Card to tap-to-authenticate. Pick Phantom or Backpack if Solana is your home chain. Pick Trust Wallet or OKX Wallet if you want native Bitcoin alongside EVM, Solana and TON in one app. Pick MetaMask if EVM is where you spend your time and you want native Solana and Bitcoin added to the wallet you already use. Match the pick to your behaviour, not to a leaderboard.

Why holding both chains in one wallet is hard

Ethereum and Solana are not two flavours of the same network. They were designed separately, and that surfaces as real friction the moment you try to manage them together.

• Different address formats. An Ethereum address is a 42-character hex string starting with 0x. A Solana address is a base58 string with no prefix. Paste one into the wrong field and the transaction simply will not go.
• Different signing and account models. EVM chains use one account and signing scheme; Solana uses another, with program-derived accounts and a different transaction structure. A wallet has to speak both languages fluently, not just display two balances.
• Separate native gas tokens. Ethereum and its rollups charge fees in ETH; Solana charges in SOL. You can hold a healthy balance on one chain and still be stuck because the account has no native token for gas. Several wallets now soften this with gas-in-another-token features, covered below, but each works differently.
• Different dApp connection handshakes. Connecting to a Solana app is not the same handshake as connecting on an EVM chain. A wallet that only properly supports one leaves you switching tools mid-task.

None of this is a defect in either chain; it is the natural result of two ecosystems maturing on their own terms. If you want the full breakdown of how these models differ, EVM vs Solana vs TON walks through it. The practical upshot is that a wallet truly handling both is doing more work than a single-chain wallet, and the candidates below solve it in different ways.

How we compared

This is a qualitative roundup, not a benchmark table. We avoid invented prices, ratings and user counts, because those change and because precise figures in this category are usually marketing rather than fact. Where we quote a vendor's own number, such as a chain count, we say whose number it is. Each wallet is judged on questions that decide fit:

• Genuine dual-chain support. Does it natively handle both Ethereum (plus EVM L2s) and Solana in the same app?
• Custody model. Do you hold your own keys, and does any convenience feature, such as social login or an exchange account in the same app, change who can move funds?
• Breadth beyond ETH + SOL. Does it reach further, with more EVM chains, Bitcoin or TON, if your portfolio is wider than two chains?
• Everyday workflow. Swapping, bridging, dApp connections and gas: how much of the job happens in one place?
• Where its limits are. Every wallet here is the right answer for some user and the wrong one for others. We say which.

All six are self-custody wallets in their main mode. Some also offer optional modes that change who holds what, so check which one you set up. Each of these is a capable product, and the differences are about fit.

The wallets compared

WATS Wallet

WATS Wallet is a fully non-custodial wallet delivered as three products: a Chrome extension, an iOS and Android mobile app, and an optional NFC Metal Card. It covers Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain and other EVM networks, plus Solana and TON, with send, receive, swap and bridge on all three ecosystems. You generate and hold your own keys and recovery phrase in the extension and the app. WATS never holds a key, and WATS Wallet uses a recovery phrase rather than a seedless setup.

The fee model is the first difference worth knowing. On EVM networks, every action is charged in ATS instead of native gas, through an ERC-4337 paymaster, and it is debited from one ATS balance on BSC (BNB Chain) whichever EVM network the transaction runs on. The gas-in-another-token features of the wallets below draw on a token held on the network you are using. This changes which token you fund, not the underlying cost: it tracks live network cost and is not a discount. Solana and TON are fully supported; fees on TON are paid in ATS, while Solana pays its own fees in SOL. Collected ATS is burned, from a 100M supply toward a 30M floor. The ATS fee page explains the mechanics.

The second difference is the card. The NFC Metal Card is optional, holds no private keys and is not cold storage. You tap it to your phone to authenticate access or confirm a signature in the mobile app. It carries a unique card ID and pairs to exactly one device. It is built on an NTAG 216 chip and tested to MIL-STD-810; the steel card's body is military-grade metal rated IP68. None of the other wallets in this post ships a physical factor of its own; several connect third-party hardware wallets, which store keys, a different job from authenticating a software wallet.

The limits: WATS Wallet does not support native Bitcoin, so if BTC anchors your portfolio you need another wallet for that slice. Solana fees are paid in SOL, so you still need a small SOL balance there; fees on TON are paid in ATS. And WATS Wallet is not a trading terminal or an exchange; if you want a wallet built around active Solana trading, Phantom is the better fit. For the wider multi-chain framing, how to manage Ethereum, Solana and TON in one wallet goes deeper.

Phantom

Phantom's home chain is Solana. It also supports Ethereum, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, HyperEVM, Robinhood Chain, Arc and native Bitcoin, so it does hold ETH and SOL in one app. Its help center lists Arbitrum and Optimism as unsupported, which matters if your Ethereum activity lives on those L2s, and it does not list TON. Phantom dropped Monad and Sui support in 2026, so check its current network list before moving assets. The extension runs on Chrome, Brave and Edge, with iOS and Android apps, and Phantom Terminal is a browser-based trading platform that syncs with mobile.

On fees, Phantom's gasless option on Solana takes a flat fee from the token you are swapping or sending when your SOL balance is too low; its EVM gasless option covers swaps only and runs through EIP-7702. Transaction Previews simulate transactions and warn about malicious ones. Phantom has no hardware device or authentication factor of its own; it connects Ledger devices, and Phantom Cash is a debit card for spending. Choose Phantom if Solana is where you live and you want native Bitcoin in the same wallet.

Backpack

Backpack's wallet now ships with Backpack Exchange in one mobile app, alongside a Chrome extension. The wallet is self-custody with a 12- or 24-word recovery phrase; the exchange account in the same app is custodial and separate, which is worth keeping distinct in your head. Solana is the home chain. EVM coverage includes Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, BNB Chain and HyperEVM. We found no TON support in Backpack's own sources, and its network lists do not include native Bitcoin.

We found no pay-gas-in-another-token feature; its BP token is a staking and fee-tier token, not a gas token. Backpack connects Ledger, Trezor and Keystone, scans transactions with Blockaid, and has no physical factor of its own. Choose Backpack if you want a Solana-first wallet that sits next to an exchange account in one app.

Trust Wallet

Trust Wallet's premise is breadth. It natively supports EVM networks, Solana, TON and Bitcoin, and its homepage advertises 100+ blockchains. On September 15, 2026 it removed built-in support for 24 networks; the EVM ones can be added back as custom networks. It runs as iOS and Android apps plus a browser extension, with a QR sync between the two. Trust has no TON gap against WATS Wallet: it covers EVM, Solana and TON like we do, plus native Bitcoin, which we do not.

Trust also offers several gas options. FlexGas lets you pay fees in tokens such as USDT or USDC on BNB Smart Chain, Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base and OP Mainnet, held on the address you send from. Gas Sponsorship pays for some swaps when your native balance is zero, and Trust Wallet SWIFT is a passkey-based smart-account wallet in beta on mobile. Trust has no hardware or card of its own; the extension can connect an external hardware wallet. Choose Trust Wallet if you want a long chain list and native Bitcoin in one app.

OKX Wallet

OKX Wallet, formerly OKX Web3 Wallet, supports EVM networks, Solana, TON and native Bitcoin. OKX itself cites 130+ blockchains on its iOS listing. TON has been native since July 2024, so, like Trust, OKX Wallet covers the same three ecosystems as WATS Wallet and adds Bitcoin, including Ordinals and Runes. It ships as a browser extension, a standalone iOS and Android app, and a Wallet mode inside the main OKX app. The Wallet mode is convenient if you already use OKX; if you would rather keep your wallet apart from an exchange app, use the standalone app.

Its Gas Station lets you pay network fees in USDC, USDT or USDG, held on the chain you transact on. As of October 2026, the help page lists Solana only. OKX Wallet connects Keystone, Ledger and OneKey hardware wallets and has no physical factor of its own. Its Social Login Wallet, launched in July 2026, keeps keys in a trusted execution environment; OKX says it does not access seed phrases or private keys. Choose OKX Wallet for breadth, Bitcoin and tight OKX integration.

MetaMask

MetaMask is the long-standing EVM extension, available on Chrome, Firefox, Brave, Opera and Edge, plus iOS and Android. Solana is native, not a Snap: it launched in the extension in May 2025 and reached mobile later that year. Native Bitcoin followed in December 2025, with Native SegWit addresses only so far. TON is not supported; MetaMask can only hold wrapped TON as an ERC-20 token on EVM chains.

Its gas-included transactions let you pick an eligible token for the network fee on Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, Arbitrum, Polygon, Linea, Base and Tempo, held on the network of the transaction. MetaMask connects a long list of third-party hardware wallets, including Ledger, Trezor and Lattice, and offers optional social-login backup with Google, Apple or Telegram. Its only physical product is the MetaMask Metal Card, a debit card for spending, with new orders paused as of June 2026 per its help center. Choose MetaMask if you are an EVM regular who wants native Solana and Bitcoin added to the wallet you already trust.

Dual-chain comparison table

Qualitative only, with no invented prices, ratings or benchmarks. Use it to map each wallet to what you actually need.

Wallet	EVM	Solana	TON	Native Bitcoin	Fees and physical factor
WATS Wallet	Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain and other EVM	Send, receive, swap, bridge; fees in SOL	Yes; fees paid in ATS	No	Every EVM action in ATS from one ATS balance on BSC; optional NFC Metal Card for tap-to-authenticate
Phantom	Ethereum, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, HyperEVM, Robinhood Chain, Arc; not Arbitrum or Optimism	Home chain	Not listed	Yes	Gasless Solana swaps and sends from the token used; EVM gasless swaps only; connects Ledger
Backpack	Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, BNB Chain, HyperEVM	Home chain	Not listed	Not listed	No gas-in-other-token feature found; wallet and exchange in one app; connects Ledger, Trezor, Keystone
Trust Wallet	Broad, plus custom EVM networks	Native	Yes	Yes	FlexGas, Gas Sponsorship and SWIFT; no hardware of its own
OKX Wallet	Very broad	Native	Yes	Yes	Gas Station in stablecoins (current page lists Solana only); connects Keystone, Ledger, OneKey
MetaMask	Original core; custom networks	Native since May 2025	No	Yes, Native SegWit only	Gas-included transactions on seven networks; connects many hardware wallets

Where WATS Wallet fits best

The case for WATS Wallet rests on three specific differences, each true against some wallets here and not others. The first is the card: if you want a physical tap-to-authenticate factor for a software wallet, the NFC Metal Card is something none of the other five ships; they either have no physical factor or connect third-party key-storage hardware. The second is fees: if you use several EVM networks and would rather fund one ATS balance on BSC than keep a gas token on each, that is the model WATS Wallet is built around. The third is TON next to EVM and Solana, an advantage over Phantom, Backpack and MetaMask, whose network lists do not include it, but not over Trust Wallet or OKX Wallet, which cover all three.

The trade-offs are plain. WATS Wallet has no native Bitcoin, so if BTC anchors your holdings, Phantom, Trust Wallet, OKX Wallet or MetaMask serves that slice. The card is not cold storage and holds no keys, and fees on TON are paid in ATS while Solana still needs SOL for fees. You hold your own keys and recovery phrase, and WATS never holds a key. You can read the broader field in managing ETH, Solana and TON in one wallet and start from the download page.

Where another wallet fits better

If Solana is your home chain, Phantom and Backpack are built around it. Phantom adds native Bitcoin, a browser trading terminal and Transaction Previews; Backpack pairs the wallet with an exchange account in one app. Neither lists TON, and neither describes a single fee balance for EVM actions. WATS Wallet's Solana support covers send, receive, swap and bridge; if your Solana routine depends on deeper tooling, check Phantom's and Backpack's current feature lists first.

If you want very long chain lists and native Bitcoin in one app, Trust Wallet or OKX Wallet is the better choice. The same logic runs on the EVM side: if almost all your activity is on Ethereum and its L2s and Solana is an occasional visit, the wallet you already trust, often MetaMask, is a reasonable choice now that it holds Solana and Bitcoin natively.

Bottom line

For holding Ethereum and Solana in one app in 2026, there is no single answer, only a fit. Choose WATS Wallet if you want Ethereum, its L2s, Solana and TON in one non-custodial wallet, with every EVM fee charged in ATS from one balance and an optional NFC Metal Card to tap-to-authenticate. Choose Phantom or Backpack if Solana is your home chain; Trust Wallet or OKX Wallet if you want native Bitcoin and a very long asset list; MetaMask if you are an EVM regular simply adding Solana. Each of the six holds both chains, so the deciding questions are TON, Bitcoin, fees and whether you want a physical factor.