WATS Wallet logoWATS Wallet
Comparison9 min read

Best Multi-Chain Crypto Wallets in 2026 (EVM, Solana and TON in One App)

We make WATS Wallet, and it is our multi-chain pick if you want EVM, Solana and TON in one self-custody wallet with a tap-to-authenticate card and every EVM fee drawn from one ATS balance. We compare it with Trust Wallet, OKX Wallet, Phantom, MetaMask, Backpack and Rabby.

By Alltoscan LLC, the company behind WATS Wallet Editorial policy

Published Updated

WATS Wallet is the multi-chain wallet we recommend if you want EVM chains (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain), Solana and TON in one self-custody wallet, plus two things no other wallet here combines with that span: the optional WATS NFC Metal Card, which you tap to your paired phone to authenticate, and every EVM network fee charged in one token, ATS, debited from a single ATS balance on BSC. The card holds no keys and is not cold storage. WATS Wallet — a Chrome extension and an iOS/Android app — is fully non-custodial: WATS never holds a key. Fees on TON are also paid in ATS, while Solana transactions pay their own SOL fee. Trust Wallet and OKX Wallet also cover all three ecosystems, reach far more networks and add native Bitcoin, which WATS Wallet does not support, so choose one of them if BTC or the longest chain list matters. Phantom is the Solana-first pick and Backpack is also Solana-rooted; MetaMask is the long-standing EVM dApp wallet, now with native Solana and Bitcoin but not TON; Rabby is built around pre-sign simulation, for EVM chains only.

Disclosure: WATS Wallet publishes this comparison, and WATS Wallet is our own product. We list it first, say plainly where it fits, and name the wallet that fits better where it does not. Competitor features were checked against each wallet's official site and help center in September 2026.

Multi-chain has quietly become the default expectation for a crypto wallet, but the label hides enormous variation. Some wallets cover dozens of EVM networks and call it a day. Others add Solana to an EVM core. A smaller group reaches across three structurally different ecosystems: the EVM family, Solana and TON. In this lineup that group is WATS Wallet, Trust Wallet and OKX Wallet, so covering all three is where the comparison starts, not where it ends. After that, native Bitcoin, the fee model and whether you want a physical security factor decide it.

Quick answer: best multi-chain wallets in 2026

If you just want the short version: WATS Wallet is our pick if you want EVM, Solana and TON in one non-custodial wallet together with an optional NFC card you tap to authenticate (it holds no keys) and every EVM network fee charged in ATS from one balance on BSC. OKX Wallet and Trust Wallet also cover EVM, Solana and TON, support far more networks overall and add native Bitcoin, so they are the right call if BTC or the longest chain list matters most. Phantom and Backpack center on Solana while also covering some EVM networks. MetaMask covers EVM and its dApp ecosystem in depth and now Solana and native Bitcoin too, but not TON, and Rabby offers pre-sign transaction simulation and risk checks, plus a prepaid gas balance, for EVM chains only. The rest of this article helps you choose by your real chain mix.

What multi-chain really means (and the BTC caveat)

The word gets stretched in marketing, so it helps to define it precisely. A wallet can be multi-chain in at least three different senses, and they are not equal:

  • Multi-EVM. Supports many Ethereum Virtual Machine networks (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain and others). These all share an address format and tooling, so adding another EVM chain is comparatively easy. A wallet that does only this is multi-chain in the narrowest sense.
  • Cross-ecosystem. Spans fundamentally different architectures, for example EVM plus Solana (a different account model and address format) plus TON (different again). This is harder to build and is where wallets genuinely diverge. In this lineup, Phantom, MetaMask and Backpack span EVM and Solana, while WATS Wallet, Trust Wallet and OKX Wallet add TON as well.
  • Including Bitcoin. Native BTC support sits apart again, because Bitcoin's UTXO model shares almost nothing with the account-based chains above. Adding it is a deliberate, separate piece of engineering.

This is where the main caveat for WATS Wallet belongs, up front: WATS Wallet does not natively support Bitcoin. It covers the EVM family, Solana and TON in one wallet, so if native BTC is a hard requirement for you, that is a real point in favor of OKX Wallet, Trust Wallet, Phantom and MetaMask, which do support it. We flag it here so the comparison table later is read in context. For a deeper primer on the concept itself, see what a multi-chain wallet actually is, and for the architectural why behind EVM, Solana and TON being so different, EVM vs Solana vs TON is the companion read.

How we compared (true chain breadth, custody, fee model)

Chain count alone is a misleading score, because forty EVM networks is a different achievement from EVM plus Solana plus TON. So this roundup weighs three things that change the real experience:

  • True chain breadth. Not just how many networks, but how many distinct ecosystems. Does it reach across EVM, Solana and TON, and does it include native Bitcoin? Breadth across architectures counts more here than a long list of EVM networks.
  • Custody model. Are you the sole signer, and who can actually move funds? We treat full self-custody as the baseline and note any deviation honestly. Every wallet compared here is self-custodial; Backpack's app also holds a separate, custodial Backpack Exchange account alongside its self-custody wallet.
  • Fee model. On a multi-chain wallet, gas is a recurring annoyance: every chain wants its own native token for fees. We note whether a wallet lets you pay gas in another token held on the same network, only for swaps, or from one balance across several networks, and we are careful not to confuse fee convenience with a discount.

No invented benchmarks, prices or user counts appear below. Each capability we attribute to a wallet, competitors included, comes from that wallet's own site, help center or announcements as they stood in September 2026.

The wallets compared

WATS Wallet

WATS Wallet is built around one self-custody identity that spans EVM (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain), Solana and TON in a single wallet. If your assets and activity are spread across an EVM rollup, Solana and TON, that removes the usual pattern of running two or three separate wallets side by side. It is not the only wallet here that reaches all three — Trust Wallet and OKX Wallet do as well, with much longer chain lists — so the reasons to choose WATS Wallet are the two things layered on top: the card and the fee model.

WATS ships three products that share that one identity: a Chrome extension for dApp work in the browser, an iOS/Android mobile app and the WATS NFC Metal Card. The card is often misread: it holds no private keys and is not cold storage. It is an authentication factor. The keys live in the WATS apps, and you tap the card to your phone to authenticate; each card carries a unique ID and pairs to exactly one device. Functionally it sits closer to a physical security key than to a cold-storage vault. The hardware is military-grade metal with an NTAG 216 chip, IP68 water resistance and a MIL-STD-810 environmental rating, and the card is optional: WATS Wallet works without it. None of the other wallets in this lineup ships a physical security factor of its own; they connect third-party hardware such as a Ledger instead.

The fee model is the second difference. In WATS Wallet on EVM networks, in the extension and the mobile app alike, every action is charged in ATS instead of that chain's native gas, via an ERC-4337 paymaster. The ATS balance sits on BSC (BNB Chain), and the fee for any EVM network is debited from that one balance rather than from a per-chain stash. Fees on TON are also paid in ATS, while Solana transactions pay their own native fee in SOL. Collected ATS is burned, taking the 100M total supply toward a 30M floor. Rabby's GasAccount is the other single-balance option in this comparison, for EVM networks only.

On custody, WATS Wallet is fully non-custodial across every product. You hold the keys; WATS never holds a key, and there is no co-signer. The limits: WATS Wallet has no native Bitcoin, and its total chain count is far smaller than Trust Wallet's or OKX Wallet's, so it is not built to hold every chain in one place. The dedicated one wallet for Ethereum, Solana and TON walkthrough covers the three-chain setup in depth.

Phantom

Phantom began as a Solana wallet and is still built Solana-first. On the EVM side it supports Ethereum, Base, Polygon, HyperEVM, Robinhood Chain and Arc, but not BNB Chain, Arbitrum or Optimism, and it adds native Bitcoin (Native SegWit and Taproot); it dropped Monad in August 2026 and Sui in September 2026. Its Transaction Previews simulate transactions and flag malicious ones before you sign, and it connects Ledger devices but ships no physical factor of its own. Its fee options center on swaps: gasless EVM swaps, where Phantom sponsors the fee or takes it in a supported token such as USDC, and gasless Solana swaps and sends when your SOL runs low. Phantom does not support TON, so if The Open Network is core to you, you would need a separate wallet for it. Its fit is a user whose primary activity is Solana and who wants some EVM and BTC in the same app.

MetaMask

MetaMask is the long-standing EVM and dApp wallet: broad dApp compatibility, a widely used browser extension and iOS/Android apps. Its non-EVM support is newer but native: Solana since May 2025, Bitcoin since December 2025 (Native SegWit addresses so far) and Tron since January 2026. It is self-custody via a recovery phrase, shows estimated balance changes and security alerts before you sign by default, and works with third-party hardware wallets. Its gas-included transactions let you pay network fees on several EVM networks in an eligible token you hold on that network. If your world is EVM and its dApps, MetaMask covers it thoroughly, with Solana and BTC alongside. What it does not reach is TON, and it ships no physical security factor: the MetaMask Card is a payment card, not an authentication device.

Trust Wallet

Trust Wallet supports 100+ blockchains in one self-custody wallet, with native Bitcoin, EVM chains, Solana and TON among them, across iOS and Android apps and a browser extension (on September 15, 2026 it removed built-in support for 25 networks; the EVM ones among them can be re-added as custom networks, while the non-EVM ones, such as Nano and MultiversX, cannot). For users who want a very long chain list including native BTC, it covers a great deal of ground. Its FlexGas lets you pay gas in USDT or USDC on BNB Chain, Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base and OP Mainnet, and in TWT on BNB Chain, as long as the fee token sits on the network you are using. Its Security Scanner simulates transactions and flags risky approvals. What Trust does not ship is a physical security factor of its own (its browser extension can connect a Ledger instead), and it does not draw EVM fees from one balance across networks. Those are the two places WATS Wallet differs.

OKX Wallet

OKX Wallet has the longest advertised chain list in this lineup, 130+ chains, including native Bitcoin (with Ordinals and Runes), Solana and TON, plus built-in swaps and ties to the OKX exchange, in a self-custody app and browser extension. If raw breadth plus an integrated trading layer is what you want, it is the natural pick here. Its Gas Station, launched in April 2026, lets you pay network fees in USDT, USDC or USDG held on the chain you are transacting on; OKX's Gas Station page currently lists Solana as the only supported network. It works with third-party hardware wallets (Ledger, Keystone, OneKey) but ships no physical security factor of its own. The trade-offs are a large, feature-dense product and an exchange tie-in that draws some users and puts off others. For a focused comparison, see WATS vs OKX. WATS Wallet differs in two ways: the NFC Metal Card, and EVM fees drawn from one ATS balance on BSC rather than from a stablecoin held on the chain you are using.

Backpack and Rabby

These two answer different needs. Backpack is a Solana-rooted self-custody wallet that now lists 15+ networks, including Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon and BNB Chain, plus Sui and Aptos; its app bundles the wallet with Backpack Exchange for trading. It has built-in scam and transaction warnings, connects Ledger, Trezor and Keystone devices, and pays fees in each network's native gas. It does not list TON or native Bitcoin. Rabby is an EVM power-user wallet: it simulates each transaction and surfaces risks before you sign, for EVM chains only, and is a common MetaMask alternative. Its GasAccount is a prepaid balance held by Rabby, funded with USDC or USDT, that pays gas on its supported EVM networks when you lack the native token. Rabby has no Solana, TON or Bitcoin support. Neither ships a physical security factor of its own.

Comparison table: EVM + Solana + TON coverage

Qualitative only, no invented prices, ratings or benchmarks. Native means built into the base wallet without third-party add-ons.

WalletEVM familySolanaTONNative BitcoinCustody modelBest for
WATS WalletYes (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain)YesYesNoSelf-custody (extension, mobile app; the NFC card holds no keys)EVM + Solana + TON with an NFC tap-to-authenticate card and every EVM fee from one ATS balance on BSC
PhantomPartial (Ethereum, Base, Polygon, HyperEVM, Robinhood Chain, Arc; no BNB Chain, Arbitrum or Optimism)Yes (home chain)NoYes (Native SegWit/Taproot)Self-custodySolana-first users who also want some EVM and BTC
MetaMaskYes (deep)YesNoYes (Native SegWit)Self-custodyEVM and dApp power users
Trust WalletYesYesYesYesSelf-custodyVery broad chain coverage, incl. BTC and TON, in one app
OKX WalletYesYesYesYesSelf-custodyThe longest chain list here (130+) plus built-in swaps
Backpack / RabbyYesBackpack: yes; Rabby: noNoNoSelf-custody (Backpack's app also holds a custodial exchange account)Solana users who also want EVM and in-app trading (Backpack) / EVM power users (Rabby)

Best for the widest native chain span incl. TON

If your requirement is one wallet that natively reaches EVM, Solana and TON together, you have several good options, and WATS Wallet is only one of them. In this lineup, OKX Wallet (130+ chains) and Trust Wallet (100+) cover all three and add native Bitcoin on top, so for the widest span they cover more ground than WATS Wallet by any count; outside this lineup, Exodus (desktop and mobile apps) and Tangem (key-holding NFC cards with a mobile app) cover all three as well. Phantom, MetaMask, Backpack and Rabby do not support TON, so with any of them you would run a separate TON wallet. Where WATS Wallet earns its place is the combination: the same three-ecosystem span on the extension and the mobile app, plus the NFC card as a tap-to-authenticate factor and every EVM fee drawn from one ATS balance. The choice is between the longest list including BTC, and a narrower EVM, Solana and TON wallet with a physical factor and one EVM fee balance.

Single-fee-token convenience on EVM

Multi-chain life has a recurring tax: every chain demands its own native token for gas, so you end up stranding small amounts of ETH and other gas tokens across accounts just to pay fees. Several wallets here now ease that, in three different ways:

  • A fee token on the same network. Trust Wallet's FlexGas and MetaMask's gas-included transactions let you pay gas in a stablecoin or other eligible token you hold on the network you are using. OKX Wallet's Gas Station works the same way with USDT, USDC or USDG, though its page currently lists only Solana.
  • Swaps only. Phantom's gasless EVM swaps let Phantom sponsor the fee or take it in a supported token such as USDC, USDT, USDG or WETH; sends still need native gas.
  • One balance across EVM networks. Rabby's GasAccount is a prepaid balance held by Rabby that pays gas on its supported EVM networks. WATS Wallet charges every EVM action in ATS, debited from one ATS balance on BSC (BNB Chain), whichever EVM network the transaction runs on.

Backpack documents no such option: you pay each network's native gas. The WATS Wallet model runs on an ERC-4337 paymaster, and three clarifications matter. First, it is not a discount and not gasless: fee abstraction changes which token pays the fee, not the real network cost, and you still need a funded ATS balance. Second, it is the same in the extension and the mobile app, and both are non-custodial: you hold your own keys, and WATS never holds a key. Third, the single ATS balance on BSC is EVM-scoped: Solana and TON are fully supported for sending, receiving, swapping and bridging, with fees on TON also paid in ATS, while Solana transactions pay their own native fee in SOL. If you would rather pay each chain's fees in its own native gas token, every other wallet here does that by default, and so does WATS Wallet on Solana (SOL), while fees on TON are paid in ATS. For the fee mechanics in detail, how the ATS fee model in WATS Wallet works spells it out, and the ATS fee page covers the product side.

How to pick for your chain mix

Match the wallet to your actual activity rather than to a chain count:

  • You need EVM + Solana + TON together. WATS Wallet, Trust Wallet and OKX Wallet all cover the three natively. Pick Trust Wallet or OKX Wallet if you also want native Bitcoin or the longest chain list; pick WATS Wallet if you also want a physical tap-to-authenticate factor and every EVM fee from one ATS balance.
  • You want a physical factor on top of a software wallet. WATS Wallet's optional NFC card holds no keys and pairs to one device. If you want the keys themselves held in hardware instead, pair a Ledger or similar device with one of the others, or look at Tangem, whose NFC cards hold the keys and cover EVM, Solana, TON and Bitcoin.
  • Bitcoin is non-negotiable. Choose OKX Wallet, Trust Wallet, Phantom or MetaMask, and OKX Wallet or Trust Wallet if you need TON as well. WATS Wallet has no native BTC, so it does not meet this requirement.
  • You live on Solana but dabble in EVM. Phantom or Backpack put Solana first with EVM alongside; if you use BNB Chain, Arbitrum or Optimism, note that Phantom does not support them.
  • You are EVM-and-dApps all day. MetaMask for broad dApp compatibility, or Rabby for pre-sign risk checks across EVM chains.
  • You want the longest possible chain list in one app. OKX Wallet and Trust Wallet cover the most networks in this lineup, BTC included.

The practical move is to write down the three or four chains you genuinely use most, check each candidate against that exact list (and against the BTC question), and pick the wallet whose native coverage matches, rather than the one with the biggest headline number. If you want to go deeper on the underlying concepts before deciding, what a multi-chain wallet is and the WATS Wallet supported chains page are good next stops.

Bottom line

If you want one self-custody wallet that natively spans EVM, Solana and TON and also want a physical tap-to-authenticate card and one EVM fee balance, WATS Wallet is the one we recommend: one identity across a Chrome extension and a mobile app, an optional NFC Metal Card that holds no keys, every EVM network fee charged in ATS from one balance on BSC, and keys that only you hold. The trade-offs are explicit: no native Bitcoin and a far smaller chain count than the breadth leaders. If BTC or the longest chain list decides it for you, OKX Wallet and Trust Wallet cover EVM, Solana and TON too and much more besides; Phantom and Backpack suit Solana-centered users; MetaMask and Rabby suit EVM and dApp depth.

Frequently asked questions

Which wallet supports EVM, Solana and TON in one app?

Several do. WATS Wallet natively spans EVM chains (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain), Solana and TON in one fully non-custodial wallet, where you hold the keys and WATS never holds a key. Trust Wallet and OKX Wallet cover all three as well, with native Bitcoin and many more networks on top, and so, outside this comparison, do Exodus and Tangem (whose NFC cards hold the keys themselves). WATS Wallet is the one we recommend if you also want an optional NFC Metal Card that you tap to authenticate (it holds no keys and pairs to one device) and every EVM network fee charged in ATS from one balance on BSC; fees on TON are also paid in ATS, while Solana transactions pay their own SOL fee. Phantom, MetaMask, Backpack and Rabby do not support TON. We make WATS Wallet, so weigh that recommendation accordingly.

Does WATS Wallet support native Bitcoin?

No. WATS Wallet natively covers the EVM family, Solana and TON in one non-custodial wallet, but it does not support native Bitcoin. If BTC is a hard requirement for you, the better fit among the wallets compared here is OKX Wallet, Trust Wallet, Phantom or MetaMask, all of which support native Bitcoin; OKX Wallet and Trust Wallet also cover TON. We flag this plainly because it is a real reason to choose a different wallet. A common setup is to keep BTC where it already is and use WATS Wallet for EVM, Solana and TON.

Does paying fees in one token on WATS Wallet make transactions cheaper?

No. On EVM networks WATS Wallet charges every action in ATS via an ERC-4337 paymaster, debited from one ATS balance on BSC, but that changes which token pays the network fee, not the underlying network cost, which the ATS fee tracks live. It is not a discount, not gasless, and you still need a funded ATS balance. The benefit is operational simplicity: one fee balance for all supported EVM networks instead of stranded native gas on each of them. It works the same way in the WATS Wallet extension and mobile app, and the single ATS balance on BSC covers EVM networks only, with fees on TON also paid in ATS and Solana transactions paying their own native fee in SOL. Among the other wallets here, Rabby's GasAccount also draws EVM gas from one prepaid balance.

Is the widest chain count always the best multi-chain wallet?

No. A long list of EVM networks is a different achievement from natively spanning EVM, Solana and TON, which are structurally very different ecosystems. Match the wallet to the three or four chains you actually use most, and to whether you need native Bitcoin, rather than choosing on headline chain count alone. If your mix is EVM, Solana and TON plus BTC, OKX Wallet or Trust Wallet covers it. Without BTC, WATS Wallet, OKX Wallet and Trust Wallet all cover it, and WATS Wallet is the one that adds an optional tap-to-authenticate card and one ATS balance for every EVM fee.