[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":19},["ShallowReactive",2],{"blog-content-en-wats-vs-rabby":3},{"slug":4,"title":5,"excerpt":6,"description":7,"bodyHtml":8,"faqItems":9},"wats-vs-rabby","WATS Wallet vs Rabby Wallet: Chains, Gas Payments and Security Compared","Rabby is an EVM-only wallet with pre-sign simulation, wide hardware-wallet support and GasAccount, which supplies native gas. WATS Wallet adds Solana and TON and pays every EVM and TON fee in ATS, with EVM fees drawn from one BSC balance. This guide compares chains, gas mechanics and security, and says when to choose each.","WATS Wallet vs Rabby Wallet: chains, gas payments and security compared, including Solana and TON support and one-balance EVM fees.","\u003Cblockquote>\u003Cp>As of October 2026, Rabby Wallet supports EVM networks only, so it cannot hold Solana or TON; its strengths are pre-sign transaction simulation, wide hardware-wallet support and a GasAccount that supplies native gas. WATS Wallet covers EVM networks, Solana and TON and charges every EVM fee in ATS from one balance on BNB Chain through an ERC-4337 paymaster. Choose Rabby for EVM-only DeFi with simulation or a hardware signer; choose WATS Wallet if you also need Solana and TON in the same wallet.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\n\u003Cp>\u003Cem>Disclosure: WATS Wallet publishes this comparison, and WATS Wallet is our own product. Rabby details come from Rabby's own help center (support.rabby.io), checked in October 2026, except the September 2024 launch coverage of GasAccount deposits, which is third-party news.\u003C\u002Fem>\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>WATS Wallet vs Rabby at a glance\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The two wallets overlap on EVM networks and self-custody, and differ on non-EVM chains, EVM gas payment and signature protection.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ctable>\n\u003Cthead>\n\u003Ctr>\u003Cth>Feature\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>Rabby Wallet\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>WATS Wallet\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003C\u002Fthead>\n\u003Ctbody>\n\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>EVM networks\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>\"80+\" natively integrated networks on one Rabby help page, \"over 90\" on another, plus custom EVM networks\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain and other EVM networks\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Non-EVM chains\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Not supported; the help center names Bitcoin, Solana and Tron\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Solana and TON; no native Bitcoin\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Platforms\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Browser extension and iOS\u002FAndroid app\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Chrome (Chromium) extension, iOS\u002FAndroid app, optional NFC Metal Card\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Paying EVM gas without holding the native coin\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>GasAccount: a prepaid balance from which Rabby sends native gas to your address\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Every EVM action charged in ATS through an ERC-4337 paymaster, from one ATS balance on BSC\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Pre-sign simulation\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Yes: balance-change preview and risk alerts\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Rabby is the stronger choice for pre-sign simulation and risk alerts\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Hardware wallets\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Extension supports 11 signers; mobile supports 4\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>WATS Wallet's own hardware element is the optional NFC Metal Card, a tap-to-authenticate factor that holds no keys\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Custody\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Self-custodial, seed phrase\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Self-custodial, seed phrase\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003C\u002Ftbody>\n\u003C\u002Ftable>\n\u003Ch2>Where is Rabby stronger?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Rabby is stronger on pre-sign transaction simulation, hardware-wallet breadth and EVM DeFi tooling.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cul>\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Simulation.\u003C\u002Fstrong> Per Rabby's help center, it previews balance changes, showing exactly how many tokens will leave your wallet. It exposes a mismatch when a site says \"Claim\" but the simulation shows \"Transfer\", and it raises yellow or red alerts. This directly addresses \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fblog\u002Fwhat-is-blind-signing\">signing what you cannot read\u003C\u002Fa>.\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Hardware signers.\u003C\u002Fstrong> The extension supports Ledger, Trezor, GridPlus, OneKey, Keystone, NGRAVE ZERO, BitBox02, CoolWallet, AirGap Vault, imToken and imKey. Mobile supports Ledger and Trezor over Bluetooth, plus Keystone and OneKey.\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>EVM DeFi tooling.\u003C\u002Fstrong> Rabby switches networks automatically for dApps, tracks tokens, NFTs and DeFi positions in one place, alerts on risky approvals and offers batch revoke. It also has built-in swap and bridge.\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Open code.\u003C\u002Fstrong> Rabby is open source, and its help center says third-party security firms audit it regularly.\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C\u002Ful>\n\u003Cp>Simulation is a protective tool, not a guarantee. Rabby's own simulation article says the feature cannot prevent all risks and that ignoring its warnings means you take responsibility for the transaction.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Does Rabby support Solana or TON?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>No: Rabby's help center says non-EVM networks are not supported, including Bitcoin, Solana and Tron, and TON is non-EVM too.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Rabby lets you add EVM networks or testnets that are not yet integrated through Settings > Add Custom Network, with limited features. That route cannot add a non-EVM chain.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>WATS Wallet supports Solana and TON alongside EVM networks, with send, receive, swap and bridge in one wallet; see \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fsupported-chains\">supported chains\u003C\u002Fa>. Solana fees are paid in SOL, and TON fees are paid in ATS (the TON coin is GRAM, formerly Toncoin; the network is still TON). Trust Wallet, OKX Wallet and Exodus also cover EVM, Solana and TON, so this is a difference versus Rabby, not a unique feature. For the technical background, see \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fblog\u002Fevm-vs-solana-vs-ton\">EVM vs Solana vs TON\u003C\u002Fa>.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>How do GasAccount and the ATS fee differ?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Both are single-balance designs for EVM gas, but GasAccount delivers native gas to your address, while the ATS fee is settled in ATS by a paymaster.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ctable>\n\u003Cthead>\n\u003Ctr>\u003Cth>Question\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>Rabby GasAccount\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth>WATS ATS fee\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003C\u002Fthead>\n\u003Ctbody>\n\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>What you fund\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>A prepaid gas balance you top up in Rabby with a deposited token; on mobile also with Apple Pay or Google Pay. Third-party launch coverage in September 2024 named USDT and USDC deposits; Rabby's current help article does not list accepted tokens\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>ATS (Alltoscan Token) held on BSC (BNB Chain)\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>How gas reaches the network\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Rabby sends enough gas tokens directly to your wallet address, so the transaction pays native gas as usual\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>An ERC-4337 paymaster settles the fee in ATS while the network still receives native gas underneath\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>What is debited\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>The transaction gas plus the cost of sending gas tokens to your address; Rabby says it charges no additional service fee\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>The ATS fee, which tracks the live network cost; it is not a discount and not cheaper gas\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd>Withdrawals and balances\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>Token deposits can be withdrawn; Apple Pay and Google Pay deposits cannot\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd>One ATS balance on BSC; no ATS bridging, no per-chain balances\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\n\u003C\u002Ftbody>\n\u003C\u002Ftable>\n\u003Cp>In short, GasAccount supplies the native coin for you, and the ATS fee replaces it as the unit you pay in. In both cases Solana is outside the scope and pays SOL; the ATS fee also applies on TON. Details: \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fblog\u002Fpay-evm-gas-from-one-bsc-balance\">how one BSC balance pays gas on every EVM network\u003C\u002Fa> and \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fblog\u002Fwhat-is-a-paymaster\">what a paymaster is\u003C\u002Fa>.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>How do the security models compare?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>Both wallets are self-custodial, but Rabby adds simulation and hardware signers while WATS Wallet adds an optional tap-to-authenticate card.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Rabby says everything is stored locally on your device, with no email or personal identifier attached. Its mobile app also offers an iCloud or Google Drive backup, encrypted with the app password. In WATS Wallet you create and hold your own keys and seed phrase in the extension and the app. WATS never holds a key and has no recovery back door, so back up your seed phrase yourself.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>The WATS NFC Metal Card is optional. It holds no private keys and is not a hardware wallet or cold storage. You tap it to the paired phone to authenticate access or confirm a signature in the WATS mobile app. It has a unique card ID, works only with that one device, and uses an NTAG 216 chip (NFC Forum Type 2) in an IP68, MIL-STD-810 metal body. See \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fnfc-card\">the NFC card page\u003C\u002Fa>.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>Decision rule: if you want keys isolated on a dedicated signing device, use a hardware wallet, which Rabby supports. See \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fblog\u002Fnfc-card-vs-hardware-wallet\">NFC card vs hardware wallet\u003C\u002Fa>.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>Which should you choose?\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>The right choice depends on which chains you use and what protects your signature.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cul>\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Choose Rabby\u003C\u002Fstrong> if you only use EVM networks, want pre-sign simulation on every transaction, or sign with a hardware wallet such as Ledger, Trezor or Keystone.\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Choose WATS Wallet\u003C\u002Fstrong> if you also hold Solana or TON assets and want them in the same wallet as your EVM assets, or if you prefer to pay every EVM fee in ATS through a paymaster from one BSC balance.\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Use both\u003C\u002Fstrong> if that fits: Rabby with a hardware signer for EVM DeFi, WATS Wallet for Solana and TON. Keep each seed phrase separate and backed up.\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C\u002Ful>\n\u003Cp>For a wider set of options, read \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fblog\u002Fbest-metamask-alternatives-2026\">best MetaMask alternatives in 2026\u003C\u002Fa>.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2>How WATS Wallet fits this comparison\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp>WATS Wallet is made by Alltoscan LLC in three products: a Chrome (Chromium) extension, an iOS\u002FAndroid app and an optional NFC Metal Card. You hold your own keys and seed phrase, and WATS never holds a key.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>It supports EVM networks, Solana and TON, with no native Bitcoin. On EVM networks every action is charged in ATS through an ERC-4337 paymaster and debited from one ATS balance on BSC in the extension and the app, so you never bridge ATS or keep a per-chain balance. The fee tracks the live network cost, so it is not cheaper gas. Read \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fats-fee\">how the ATS fee works\u003C\u002Fa>. The NFC card is tap-to-authenticate, holds no keys and works only with its paired phone, in the WATS mobile app.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>If you need simulation and hardware signing for EVM-only DeFi, Rabby is the better fit. WATS Wallet fits users who want Solana and TON alongside EVM networks and a single EVM fee balance. A similar comparison is in \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fblog\u002Fwats-vs-metamask\">WATS Wallet vs MetaMask\u003C\u002Fa>.\u003C\u002Fp>",[10,13,16],{"q":11,"a":12},"Does Rabby Wallet support Solana or TON?","No. Rabby's help center says it supports EVM-compatible networks only and that Bitcoin, Solana and Tron are not supported. TON is non-EVM as well, and Rabby's custom-network feature can only add EVM chains. To keep Solana or TON in the same wallet as EVM assets, you need a multi-chain wallet such as WATS Wallet, which supports EVM networks, Solana and TON.",{"q":14,"a":15},"Is Rabby GasAccount the same as paying gas in one token with WATS Wallet?","No, the mechanisms differ. With GasAccount you top up a prepaid gas balance in Rabby, and when you lack native gas, Rabby sends native gas tokens to your address and debits the gas plus the transfer cost. WATS Wallet uses an ERC-4337 paymaster that settles each EVM fee in ATS from one balance on BSC. Neither approach is presented as a discount on network gas: the ATS fee tracks the live network cost, and Rabby says GasAccount adds no service fee.",{"q":17,"a":18},"Is the WATS NFC Metal Card a hardware wallet like the Ledger or Trezor you can use with Rabby?","No. The WATS card holds no private keys and is not cold storage. It is a tap-to-authenticate factor that confirms access or a signature in the WATS mobile app and works only with its one paired phone. If you want keys isolated on a dedicated signing device, use a hardware wallet; Rabby supports Ledger, Trezor, Keystone, OneKey and others.",1792535020192]